Schook, D. M, M. D. Collins, W. E. Jensen, P. J. Williams, N. E. Bader, and T. H. Parker 2008. Geographic patterns of song similarity in the Dickcissel (Spiza americana). Auk. 125. in press
Parker, T. H., and J. D. Ligon. 2007. Multiple aspects of condition influence a heritable sexual trait: a synthesis of the evidence for capture of genetic variance in red junglefowl. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 92: 651-660. pdf
Parker, T. H. and H. Tillin. 2006 Male blue tits Parus caeruleus choose early-leafing tree species during spring dawn chorus. Bird Study. 53: 253-257. pdf
Parker, T. H. , C. D. Becker, B. K. Sandercock, and A. E. Agreda. 2006. Apparent survival estimates from five species of tropical birds in an endangered forest habitat in western Ecuador. Biotropica. 38: 764-769. pdf
Parker, T. H. , I. Barr, and S.C. Griffith. 2006. The blue tit’s song is an inconsistent signal of male condition. Behavioral Ecology. 17: 1029-1040.lay summary, pdf
Kosciuch, K. L. T. H. Parker, and B. K. Sandercock. 2006. Nest desertion by a cowbird host: an antiparasite behavior or a response to egg loss? Behavioral Ecology. 17: 917-924. lay summary, pdf
Parker, T. H. , D. Thompson, J. D. Ligon, B. Schneider, and F. Byrn. 2006. Does red junglefowl comb size predict sperm swimming speed and motility? Ethology, Ecology, and Evolution 18: 53-60. pdf
Griffith, S. C., T. H. Parker, and V. A. Olson. 2006 . Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Animal Behaviour 71: 749-763. pdf
Parker,T. H.,J. C. Hagelin, and J. D. Ligon. 2005. Do female Callipepla quail respond to male plumage ornaments? Animal Behaviour 70:e7-e9. pdf
Parker, T. H. 2005. No evidence for adaptive differential sex allocation in red junglefowl. Auk122: 1161-1168. pdf
Parker, T. H. and D. Garant. 2005. Quantitative genetics of ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus ). Heredity 95: 401-407. pdf
Parker, T. H. , B. M. Stansberry, C. D. Becker, and P. S. Gipson. 2005. Edge and area effects on the occurrence of migrant forest songbirds. Conservation Biology 19: 1157-1167. appendices, pdf
Parker, T. H. and D. Garant. 2004. Quantitative genetics of sexually dimorphic traits and capture of genetic variance by a sexually-selected condition-dependent ornament in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 1277-1285. pdf
Parker, T. H. , B. M. Stansberry, C. D. Becker, and P. S. Gipson. 2003. Do melanin or carotenoid pigmented plumage ornaments signal condition and predict pairing success in the Kentucky Warbler? Condor 105: 663-671. pdf
Parker, T. H. 2003. Genetic benefits of mate choice separated from differential maternal investment . Evolution 57: 2157-2165. pdf
Parker, T. H. and J. D. Ligon. 2003. Female mating preferences in red junglefowl: a meta-analysis. Ethology, Ecology, and Evolution 15: 63-72. pdf
Parker , T. H and J. D. Ligon. 2002. Dominant male red junglefowl test the dominance status of other males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 53:20-24. pdf
Parker, T. H. , R. Knapp, and J. A. Rosenfield. 2002. Social mediation of sexually selected ornamentation and steroid hormone levels in male junglefowl. Animal Behaviour 64:291-298. pdf
Parker, T. H. 2002. Maternal condition, reproductive investment, and offspring sex ratio in captive red junglefowl (Gallus gallus ) Auk 119: 840-845. pdf See Parker 2005 Auk (above) for corrected analyses
Parody, J. M. and T. H. Parker. 2002. Biogeographic variation in nest placement: a case study with conservation implications. Diversity and Distributions 8:11-20. pdf
Parker, T. H. 1999. Responses of Bell’s Vireos to brood parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird in Kansas. Wilson Bulletin 111: 499-504. pdf